BEYOND HUMAN AUTHORSHIP: EXPLORING CREATIVE IDENTITY AND LITERARY ORIGINALITY IN AI-ASSISTED ENGLISH WRITING

Authors

  • Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh Professor of English, Department of Humanities, O. P. Jindal University, Raigarh, CG

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Creative Identity, Literary Originality, AI-Assisted Writing, Human Authorship

Abstract

The growing integration of artificial intelligence into English writing has transformed traditional concepts of creative identity, literary originality, and human authorship. This study examines the influence of AI-assisted writing on creative expression, narrative development, and ethical responsibility. A descriptive and exploratory research framework is adopted, supported by secondary literature and an illustrative dataset of 30 respondents. The illustrative findings indicate that 73.3% of respondents frequently or occasionally use AI writing tools, while 46.7% identify improved creativity as their primary benefit. Furthermore, 66.7% believe that artificial intelligence influences literary originality, and 36.7% identify plagiarism and originality as major ethical concerns. Published research also suggests that generative AI can enhance individual creativity while reducing collective literary diversity. The study concludes that AI-assisted writing offers opportunities for literary innovation but requires human creative control, ethical transparency, and independent judgment to preserve authentic authorship and distinctive literary expression in contemporary English literature.

References

I. Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In S. Heath (Ed. & Trans.), Image–music–text (pp. 142–148). Hill and Wang.

II. Doshi, A. R., & Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28), eadn5290.

III. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al. (2023).

IV. Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681–694.

V. Formosa, P., Bankins, S., Matulionyte, R., & Ghasemi, O. (2025). Can ChatGPT be an author? Generative AI creative writing assistance and perceptions of authorship, creatorship, responsibility, and disclosure. AI & Society, 40, 3405–3417.

VI. Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 113–138). Cornell University Press.

VII. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.

VIII. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192.

IX. Tsao, J., & Nogues, C. (2024). Beyond the author: Artificial intelligence, creative writing and intellectual emancipation. Poetics, 102, Article 101865.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

01-10-2026

How to Cite

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh. (2026). BEYOND HUMAN AUTHORSHIP: EXPLORING CREATIVE IDENTITY AND LITERARY ORIGINALITY IN AI-ASSISTED ENGLISH WRITING. International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal, 11(10), 31–37. Retrieved from https://ieasrj.com/journals/index.php/ieasrj/article/view/701