A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF CONJOINED AND DUAL SHEAR SYSTEM

Authors

  • Sunil R. Wakode UG Studnt, Government College of Engineering Jalgaon, Opposite Government ITI, National Highway Number 6, Jalgaon, Maharashtra
  • Sayali S. Rajput UG Studnt, Government College of Engineering Jalgaon, Opposite Government ITI, National Highway Number 6, Jalgaon, Maharashtra
  • Pranali G. Munrativar UG Studnt, Government College of Engineering Jalgaon, Opposite Government ITI, National Highway Number 6, Jalgaon, Maharashtra
  • Kamlesh S. Rathode UG Studnt, Government College of Engineering Jalgaon, Opposite Government ITI, National Highway Number 6, Jalgaon, Maharashtra
  • Yash S. Shelke UG Studnt, Government College of Engineering Jalgaon, Opposite Government ITI, National Highway Number 6, Jalgaon, Maharashtra
  • Proof. V. T Patil Assistant Professor, Government College of Engineering Jalgaon, Opposite Government ITI, National Highway Number 6, Jalgaon, Maharashtra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17045475

Keywords:

Conjoined Tower, Three Dimensional Analysis of Building, ETAB, Skycrapers, Maximum Storey Displacemen, Maximum Storey Drift, Maximum Storey Shear, Maximum Storey Overturning Moment

Abstract

This report presents a step by step and detailed analysis of various structural systems involving trial designs to discover an innovative structural design for enhanced structural stability and unique spatial configurations in tall building projects. Trials include models wherein the first model encompasses a truss configuration which fails for our requirements. By employing ETABS V.22.4.0 Software, various loading scenarios as per IS 875: 2015, standards are employed to know the story response plots, maximum story displacement, maximum drift, maximum story shear, time period and maximum overturning moment. ETABS stands for Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building System. ETABS is commonly used to analyze: Skyscrapers, concrete structures, low and high rise buildings, and portal frame structures.

This conjoined model is then compared with a dual shear wall system where in comparison is made for result parameters such as maximum story displacement, maximum story drift, maximum story shear and maximum overturning moment. The various parameters such as Height, Quality of Concrete, Plan Area and FSI being kept the same. This comparison shows us the key potential of conjoined systems compared to other structural systems.

References

I. IS: 456 (2000). “Indian Standard plain and reinforced concrete - Code of practice.” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

II. IS 875 (Part 3): 2015. "Design Loads Other than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structures

- Code of Practice." Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

III. IS 13920 (1993). “Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces.” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

IV. IS 4326 (1993). “Earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings.” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

V. Bungale S. Taranath "Structural Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings - Steel and Composite Construction." CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group.

VI. Kyoung Sun Moon (2010) “Stiffness-based design methodology for steel braced tube structures: A sustainable approach https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029610002440/pdfft?md5=4ac640cc e0dbe666b1b575b818bbb45b&pid=1-s2.0-S0141029610002440-main.pdf

VII. Kyoung Sun Moon (2011) “Diagrid Structures for Complex-Shaped Tall Buildings” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187770581101246X/pdf?md5=6fc90169e dbbbb37f1931b27fa84d871&pid=1-s2.0-S187770581101246X-main.pdf

VIII. Hi Sun Choi and Leonard Joseph (2012) “Outrigger Design for High-Rise Buildings – 2nd Edition - CTBUH Web Shop”

IX. Snidal S. Mali, D. M. Joshi, Roshni John (2013) “(28) Response of High Rise Building with Different Diagrid Structural System | IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology and Engineering - Academia.edu”

X. Giovanni Maria Montuori, Elena Mele, Giuseppe Brandonisio and Antonello De Luca (2014) “Diagrid systems coupled with closed- and open-section shear walls: Optimization of geometrical characteristics in tall buildings - ScienceDirect”

XI. Kyoung Sun Moon, Simos Gerasimidis, Panagiotis Pantidis, Brendan Knickle (2016) “Diagrid Structural System for High-Rise Buildings: Applications of a Simple Stiffness based Optimized Design | Request PDF (researchgate.net)”

XII. Khushbu Jania, Paresh V. Patelb (2017) “Analysis and Design of Diagrid Structural System for High Rise Steel Buildings - ScienceDirect”

XIII. Mir M. Ali and Kyoung Sun Moon (2018) “(28) Advances in Structural Systems for Tall Buildings: Emerging Developments for Contemporary Urban Giants | Kyoung Sun Moon - Academia.edu”

XIV. Swetha Singh, Nandeshwar Lata, Dr. Bharat Nagar, Rajesh Kumar (2019) “(28) Comparative Analysis of RCC Structure and Tube-In-Tube Structure | bharat nagar - Academia.edu”

Additional Files

Published

01-06-2025

How to Cite

Sunil R. Wakode, Sayali S. Rajput, Pranali G. Munrativar, Kamlesh S. Rathode, Yash S. Shelke, & Proof. V. T Patil. (2025). A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF CONJOINED AND DUAL SHEAR SYSTEM. International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17045475

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 6 (2025): JUNE ISSUE, INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH JOURNAL

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.