AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF ESG REPORTING PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES: EVIDENCE FROM CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN GUJARAT
Keywords:
ESG Reporting, Chartered Accountants, BRSR, Sustainability, Corporate Governance, GujaratAbstract
Corporate accountability extends far beyond financial metrics today. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting has emerged as a critical requirement for businesses globally. This study investigates the current landscape of ESG reporting practices and the associated challenges within the industrial state of Gujarat. The research focuses specifically on Chartered Accountants (CAs), who serve as the primary assurance providers and advisors for corporate disclosures. The primary objectives are to evaluate the awareness and adoption levels of ESG frameworks among these professionals and to identify the practical hurdles they face during implementation and auditing. Utilizing a quantitative research methodology, primary data was collected from a random sample of 150 Chartered Accountants practicing across various cities in Gujarat. The data analysis employs descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to draw meaningful inferences. Findings indicate a high general awareness of mandates like the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework. However, practical application remains constrained. CAs struggle significantly with the lack of standardized measurement tools for social metrics, pervasive risks of greenwashing, and inadequate client data systems. The study highlights an urgent need for targeted capacity building and clearer regulatory guidelines to bridge the gap between theoretical ESG mandates and ground-level reporting realities.
References
I. Bhattacharya, R. (2020). Unmasking corporate greenwashing: The limitations of independent assurance in sustainability reporting. Journal of Corporate Governance and Accountability, 14(3), 45-62.
II. Das, P., & Mishra, S. (2021). Expectation gaps in non-financial reporting: An institutional investor perspective on ESG assurance. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 112-128.
III. Gupta, A., & Shah, V. (2021). The subjective nature of the 'S' in ESG: Inconsistencies in measuring social metrics. International Journal of Sustainability Measurement, 5(2), 77-94.
IV. Joshi, K., & Mehta, P. (2021). Selective environmental disclosures in heavy manufacturing: Evidence from the chemical sector in Gujarat. Journal of Environmental Management and Planning, 18(4), 201-219.
V. Nair, S. (2021). Redefining the accounting curriculum: Capacity building for the era of sustainability reporting. Journal of Accounting Education and Practice, 22(1), 33-49.
VI. Patel, M., & Desai, N. (2020). Implementation hurdles of the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework in India. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management, 11(2), 88-105.
VII. Rao, K., & Iyer, L. (2020). Governance structures and their impact on the reliability of ESG disclosures. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 16(1), 22-38.
VIII. Sharma, A., & Kumar, R. (2021). The transition from CSR to ESG in emerging markets: Compliance over strategy. Global Business Review, 19(5), 310-327.
IX. Singh, T. (2021). Beyond the balance sheet: The evolving skill set of financial auditors in ESG assurance. Auditing and Assurance Review, 8(3), 14-29.
X. Verma, L. (2021). The trickle-down effect: Sustainability reporting burdens on Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of SME Research, 12(4), 55-71.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.