EDUCATIONAL ASPIRATIONS IN ACHIEVING EDUCATIONAL GOALS
Keywords:
Educational Aspirations, Gender Differences, Secondary School, Parental Influences, Socioeconomic FactorsAbstract
The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the educational aspirations of male and female students in secondary schools. The research seeks to understand the factors that influence students' educational goals and identify any significant differences between genders. The research used a mixed-methods approach, using both quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to gather comprehensive data from a representative sample of secondary school students. The research analysed crucial attributes, such as socioeconomic status, parental impact, academic performance, and peer engagement, to ascertain their impact on students' aspirations.
The findings demonstrate significant discrepancies in the educational aspirations between men and girls. Males often shown a stronger desire to pursue occupations in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), while females had a higher inclination towards professions in the humanities and social sciences. The study also highlights the impact of parental support and societal expectations in shaping these goals. Furthermore, qualitative research suggests that women often face increased societal and familial pressures to conform to traditional gender norms, which might hinder their capacity to pursue further education and ambitious professional paths. These findings highlight the need for targeted activities and regulations to provide equal educational opportunities and inspire people of all genders to pursue their objectives without gender-based bias.
References
I. Agger, C A., & Meece, J L. (2023, November 10). Gender and Academic Motivation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868260819
II. Ahmad, M S., Kamaruddin, K., & Rahman, N S A. (2021, July 29). Financial Management of Family Institutions in Iqbal Membina Jaya Children's Novel. , 11(7). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i7/10597
III. Ahmad, P A., Ismail, N., & Mustakim, S S. (2022, September 19). The Divergence in Demographic Factors of Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) Teacher Commitment. , 11(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i3/14528
IV. Alinea, J M L., & Reyes, W S. (2022, November 1). GENDER ISSUES TOWARD GENDER-RESPONSIVE TVTED CURRICULUM PRACTICES. Dalat University, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.37569/dalatuniversity.13.3.1062(2023)
V. Batra, P. (2020, November 2). Re-imagining curriculum in India: Charting a path beyond the pandemic. Springer Science+Business Media, 51(1-3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09518-6
VI. Blanco, N., & Rodríguez-Martínez, C. (2023, November 10). Attitude and commitment to school of successful secondary school students. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02103702.2015.1054663
VII. Breda, T., Jouini, E., & Napp, C. (2023, June 27). Gender differences in the intention to study math increase with math performance. Nature Portfolio, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39079-z
VIII. Cimpian, J R., Kim, T H., & McDermott, Z T. (2020, June 19). Understanding persistent gender gaps in STEM. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 368(6497), 1317-1319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7377
IX. Ebenso, B., Mbachu, C., Etiaba, E., Huss, R., Manzano, A., Onwujekwe, O., Uzochukwu, B., Ezumah, N., Ensor, T., Hicks, J., & Mirzoev, T. (2023, October 27). Which mechanisms explain the motivation of primary health workers? Insights from the realist evaluation of a maternal and child health programme in Nigeria. https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/8/e002408.full.pdf
X. Erdmann, M., Hill, A M., Helbig, M., & Leuze, K. (2023, June 9). Do women's empowerment and self-expression values change adolescents' gendered occupational expectations? Longitudinal evidence against the gender-equality paradox from 26 European countries. Frontiers Media, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1175651
XI. Ferreira, P., Castro, L., & Silva, C. (2023, July 15). Similarities and Dissimilarities in Student Grades Distributions, Over Time and by Gender. RU Publications, volume-12-2023(volume-12-issue-3-july-2023), 1495-1508. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1495
XII. Fox, M F., & Faver, C A. (2023, November 10). Achievement and Aspiration. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073088848100800403
XIII. Goble, E P W C W W P G W U P. (2023, November 10). Gender and Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868921512
XIV. Haider, M S. (2019, October 5). Framing Disability and Gender into Intersectionality Theory: An Analytical Review. , 8(10), 1630-1635. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20202305
XV. Hussain, T., Umar, H., Khan, I., & Batool, I. (2023, March 31). Gender Representation: A Survey of Public Sector English Textbooks of Grades 7 and 8, KP, Pakistan. University of Management and Technology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct.51.04
XVI. Kristiyani, T., & Faturochman, F. (2020, January 1). Exploring University Students’ Learning Goals. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.115
XVII. Li, R., Hassan, N C., & Saharuddin, N. (2023, July 31). College Student’s Academic Help-Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 13(8), 637-637. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080637
XVIII. Liang, J., Wang, L., Luo, J., Yan, Y., & Fan, C. (2023, December 22). The relationship between student interaction with generative artificial intelligence and learning achievement: serial mediating roles of self-efficacy and cognitive engagement. Frontiers Media, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285392
XIX. Marsh, H W., Pekrun, R., Guo, J., Hattie, J., & Karin, E. (2023, April 19). Too Much of a Good Thing Might Be Bad: the Double-Edged Sword of Parental Aspirations and the Adverse Effects of Aspiration-Expectation Gaps. Springer Science+Business Media, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09768-8
XX. Michaud, P., Delbos-Piot, I., & Narring, P. (2023, November 10). Silent dropouts in health surveys: are nonrespondent absent teenagers different from those who participate in school-based health surveys?. http://jahonline.org/retrieve/pii/S1054139X97002401
XXI. Moulton, V., Flouri, E., Joshi, H., & Sullivan, A. (2016, September 19). Individual-level predictors of young children’s aspirations. Taylor & Francis, 33(1), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225797
XXII. Nguyễn, N. (2021, June 1). A review of social license to operate in Southeast Asian mining. Elsevier BV, 8(2), 100841-100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.11.007
XXIII. Pahlke, E., & Goble, P. (2023, November 10). Gender and Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868921512
XXIV. Pasha, H K. (2023, March 22). Gender Differences in Education: Are Girls Neglected in Pakistani Society?. Springer Science+Business Media, 15(1), 3466-3511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01222-y
XXV. Quenzel, G., & Hurrelmann, K. (2023, November 10). The growing gender gap in education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02673843.2012.665168
XXVI. Sarma, S K., & Pai, T A. (2023, November 10). Data Collection in Organizational Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973005215569384
XXVII. Selvarajoo, P C B., & Baharudin, S N A. (2023, April 11). Factors Contributing to Poor Academic Achievement among Underachieving Students in A High School in Klang Valley: A Case Study. , 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i4/16902
XXVIII. Shah, S H., Harris, L M., Menghwani, V., Stoler, J., Brewis, A., Miller, J D., Workman, C L., Adams, E A., Pearson, A L., Hagaman, A., Wutich, A., & Young, S L. (2023, March 15). Variations in household water affordability and water insecurity: An intersectional perspective from 18 low- and middle-income countries. SAGE Publishing, 2(3), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825231156900
XXIX. Stoet, G., & Geary, D C. (2020, June 8). Gender differences in the pathways to higher education. National Academy of Sciences, 117(25), 14073-14076. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002861117
XXX. Subedi, K R., & Gaulee, U. (2023, September 4). Interviewing Female Teachers as a Male Researcher: A Field Reflection from a Patriarchal Society Perspective. Nova Southeastern University. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5651
XXXI. Teodorowski, P., Rodgers, S., Fleming, K M., Tahir, N., Ahmed, S., & Frith, L. (2023, July 13). Exploring how to improve the involvement of Polish and South Asian communities around big data research. A qualitative study using COM-B model. Swansea University, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2130
XXXII. Tompsett, J., & Knoester, C. (2023, April 11). Family socioeconomic status and college attendance: A consideration of individual-level and school-level pathways. Public Library of Science, 18(4), e0284188-e0284188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284188
XXXIII. Ullah, R. (2019, August 2). Boys versus girls’ educational performance: Empirical evidences from global north and global south. , 7(4), 163-167. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.74.19.036
XXXIV. Villegas, J., Biol, R C., Simbahon, J., & Dacullo, J. (2022, June 19). Gender, numbers and beyond: The case of criminology program in DOrSU, City of Mati, Philippines. , 13(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v13i1.1
XXXV. Wondimagegne, Y A., Debelew, G T., & Koricha, Z B. (2023, March 1). Barriers to contraceptive use among secondary school adolescents in Gedeo zone, South Ethiopia: a formative qualitative study. BMJ, 13(3), e060582-e060582. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060582
XXXVI. Yang, B. (2023, March 1). From STEM to STEAM: The Connections and Fostering of Creativity in STEAM. , 2(1), 441-446. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022322
XXXVII. Younas, A., Pedersen, M., & Inayat, S. (2022, August 17). Practical strategies to identify and address discordant findings in mixed methods research. SAGE Publishing, 4(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221122342
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
