THE PREVALENCE OF TECHNOLOGY (INTERNET) ADDICTION AMONG THE SCHOOL GOING ADOLESCENTS (10-19 YEARS) - A SCHOOL BASED CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescence (10–19 years) represents the transition between childhood and adulthood; the expectations and choices made during adolescence have a significant impact not only on current health practices and well-being but also on their health as adults. Similar to most addictive behaviors, adolescents are more vulnerable to technology addiction because of its easy availability, their limited capacity for self-regulation and increased risk of peer pressure and experimentation.1-3 Excessive use of the Technology has become one of the leading challenges of the modern society and causes both physical and mental impairment in adolescents. Adolescents with technology addiction often have physical symptoms, social skills deficit, sleeping disorders and sedentary behaviors forming important risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs)3,4 and have deleterious effects on their family, social, academic or work environments.5-7 Technology addiction is defined as a psychological state of dependency on the use of a technology to such a degree that the following typical behavioral addiction symptoms may arise1:1) salience-the technology dominates a user’s thoughts and behaviors; 2) withdrawal-negative emotions arise if a person cannot use the technology; 3) conflict-the use of the technology conflicts with other tasks, which impairs normal functioning; 4) relapse and reinstatement-a user is unable to voluntarily reduce the use of the technology; 5) tolerance-a person has to use the technology to a larger extent to produce thrill; and 6) mood modification-using the technology offers thrill and relief, and results in mood changes.8 Objectives of the study was to determine the prevalence of technology (internet) addiction among school going adolescents (10-19 years).
Method of study: This school based cross-sectional observational study was carried out at selected school settings from February 2023 to November 2023 in city of Jamnagar, Gujarat. 429 students from 10 to 19 years were enrolled after their and parental informed consent in the study. They were screened for technology addiction by using Internet addiction test-Adolescent scale. The study also examined the comparison among various adolescent stages and between public and private schools students and also provided knowledge on health impacts due to internet addiction.
Result: The present study included total of 429 students of which 216 were from public and 213 students were from private schools. Considering gender distribution 56% were males and 44% were females. The mean age of study population was 14.5 years. 173, 188 and 68 students belonged to early, middle and late adolescent stage groups respectively. Out of 216 public school students 85, 101 and 30 were early, middle and late adolescents and out of 213 private schools students 88, 87 and 38 were early, middle and late adolescents. Considering Internet Addiction, 42% had mild, 27.5% had moderate and 0.5% had severe addiction. Majority had mild internet addiction. Maximum mild addiction was in early Adolescents while severe addiction seen more in late adolescents (1.5%). Mild and moderate internet addiction was more among public school students. While severe addiction was more in private school students. Mild Addiction was more in females while moderate addiction was more in males. All physical problems were more in severe internet addiction. The mean time of physical activity was 37 minutes. Maximum physical activities were done by Early adolescents. Instagram is most common application used and the most common purpose of application use was entertainment. Mean duration of using technology was 1.9 hours. 218 (50.8%) students use internet during bed time while use of technology by parents was seen in 247 students (57.6%).
Conclusion: The study evaluated technology(internet) addiction among 429 students. 70% had internet addiction. Males and private school students were more addicted to technology (p value->0.05). All physical problems were associated with addiction (p value-<0.05). Thus this study throws light on an important growing health issue affecting adolescents that deserves serious attention from parents, schools, and policymakers and follow treatment techniques for Internet addiction.
References
I. O’Keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K, Council on Communications and Media. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 2011;127:800–4.
II. PaulusFW,OhmannS,vonGontardAetal.Internetgamingdisorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018;60:645–59.
III. Jorgenson AG, Hsiao RC-J, Yen C-F. Internet addiction and other behavioral addictions. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2016;25:509–20.
IV. Gedam SR, Ghosh S, Modi L et al. Study of internet addiction: prevalence, pattern, and psychopathology among health professional undergraduates. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2017;33:305.
V. Chou W-J, Huang M-F, Chang Y-P et al. Social skills deficits and their association with Locus of control in adolescence: a longitudinal study. Adolescence. 1996;31:721–9.
VI. 22. Eccles JS. The Development of Children Ages 6 to 14. Future Child. 1999;9:30–44.
VII. 23. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:593–602. Internet addiction and activities in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Behav Addict 2017;6:42–50.
VIII. Kim H-J, Min J-Y, Min K-B et al. Relationship among family environment, self-control, friendship quality, and adolescents’ smartphone addiction in South Korea: findings from nationwide data. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190896.
IX. Wu X, Chen X, Han J et al. Prevalence and factors of addictive Internet use among adolescents in Wuhan, China: interactions of parental relationship with age and hyperactivity-impulsivity. PLoS One 2013;8:e61782.
X. Young KS. Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the Internet: a case that breaks the stereotype. Psychol Rep 1996;79(3):899-902
XI. Echeburúa E, de Corral P. Addiction to new technologies and to online social networking in young people: A new challenge. Adicciones. 2010;22(2):915.
XII. Brenner V. Psychology of computer use: XLVII, parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet usage survey. Psychological Reports. 1997; 80(3):879– 82.
XIII. Widyanto L, Griffiths M. Internet Addiction: A critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2006; 4(1):31–51.
XIV. Kim K, Ryu E, Chon MY, Yeun EJ, Choi SY, Seo JS, Nam BW. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2006;43(2):18592.
XV. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;1(3):237-44.
XVI. Tsai CC, Lin SS. Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: An interview study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003;6(6):649-52.
XVII. Adalıer A, Balkan E. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNET ADDICTION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SYMPTOMS. Int J Glob Educ IJGE ISSN. 2012;1:2146–9296.
XVIII. Berzonsky MD. Inter-and intraindividual differences in adolescent storm and stress: a Life-Span Developmental View. J Early Adolesc. 1982;2:211–7.
XIX. Biddle BJ, Bank BJ, Marjorie M, Marlin. Parental and peer influence on Adolescents*. Soc Forces. 1980;58:1057–79.
XX. Avedissian T, Alayan N. Adolescent well-being: a concept analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30:357–67.
XXI. Blakemore S-J, Mills KL. Is adolescence a sensitive period for Sociocultural Processing? Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:187–207.
XXII. Smollar J, Youniss J. Transformations in adolescents’ perceptions of parents. Int J Behav Dev. 1989;12:71–84.
XXIII. Kulas H.
XXIV. Gauri Sharma, Heenakshi Bhansali. A comparative study of Internet Addiction among Private and Government school students. Journal of Positive School.2022, Vol. 6, No. 4, 8864–8866
XXV. Grour MW, Thomas SP, Shoffner D. Adolescent stress and coping: a longitudinal study. Res Nurs Health. 1992;15:209–17.
XXVI. Shaw M, Black DW. Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs. 2008; 22 (5):353-65.
XXVII. 10. Pies R. Should DSM-V designate “Internet Addiction” a Mental Disorder? Psychiatry Edgmont Pa Townsh. 2009;6:31–7.
XXVIII. Valdez CR, Lambert SF, Ialongo NS. Identifying patterns of early risk for Mental Health and academic problems in adolescence: a longitudinal study of Urban Youth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011;42:521–38.
XXIX. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for the Classification of Psychiatric Disorders – 4th edition text revised (DSM-IVTR). American Psychiatric Publishing ; 2000
XXX. Young KS. Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction--and a winning strategy for recovery. John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
XXXI. Kardaras, N. (2016). Generation Z: Online and at Risk?. Scientific American Mind, 27(5), 6469.
XXXII. World Health Organization. . The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization. 2002
XXXIII. Swingle, M. i-Minds: How cell phones, computers, gaming, and social media are changing our brains, our behavior, and the evolution of our species.New Society Publishers.2016
XXXIV. Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M et al. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict 2015;4:299–307.
XXXV. González-Bueso V, Santamaría JJ, Fernández D etal. Internet gaming disorder in adolescents: personality, psychopathology and evaluation of a psychological intervention combined with parent psychoeducation. Front Psychol 2018;9:787.
XXXVI. World Health Organization. Adolescent health, https://www.who.int/we sternpacific/health-topics/adolescent-health (22 July 2020, date last accessed).
XXXVII. Davey S, Davey A. Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian adolescents: a mixed method study by systematic-review and metaanalysis approach. Int J Prev Med 2014;5:1500–11.
XXXVIII. Goel D, Subramanyam A, Kamath R. A study on the prevalence of internet addiction and its association with psychopathology in Indian adolescents. Indian J Psychiatry 2013;55:140–3.
XXXIX. Gentile D. Pathological video-game use among youth ages 8 to 18: a national study. Psychol Sci 2009;20(5):594-602.
XL. Goel D, Subramanyam A, Kamath R. A study on the prevalence of internet addiction and its association with psychopathology in Indian adolescents. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55:140–3.
XLI. Koukia E, Mangoulia P, Alexiou E. Internet addiction and psychopathological symptoms in Greek University students. J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2014;5:2.
XLII. Gauri Sharma, Heenakshi Bhansali. A comparative study of Internet Addiction among Private and Government school students. Journal of Positive School.2022, Vol. 6, No. 4, 8864–8866
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.