CONSTRAINING MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS USING DESI BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS AND PLANCK CMB OBSERVATIONS: A COMPARATIVE COSMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Neetu Singh Department of Physics, Faculty of Science & Technology, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women's University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Dr. Saurabh Singh Department of Physics, Faculty of Science & Technology, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women's University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Keywords:

Modified Gravity, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, DESI, Planck CMB, ΛCDM, Cosmological Parameter Estimation, Structure Growth, Bayesian Inference

Abstract

Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations provide complementary tests of the expansion history and gravitational dynamics of the Universe. This article develops a comparative framework for assessing phenomenological and theory-based modified-gravity models against the standard flat ΛCDM reference using DESI BAO measurements and Planck CMB information. The manuscript synthesizes published observational constraints, identifies the distinct roles of geometric and growth-sensitive probes, and outlines a reproducible inference strategy for model comparison. Particular attention is given to parameter degeneracies, the distinction between background expansion and perturbation growth, and the importance of theoretical stability. Published DESI analyses show that BAO measurements tightly constrain cosmological distances and that joint combinations with CMB information improve parameter determination; however, these results do not by themselves establish a preference for modified gravity. No new MCMC chain or modified-gravity likelihood fit is claimed here. The tables and figures are therefore comparative and methodological, with quantitative values explicitly identified as published benchmarks rather than original estimates. The framework is intended to support a subsequent reproducible analysis using public likelihoods and chains.

References

I. Adame, A. G., et al. (DESI Collaboration). DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025(02), 021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

II. DESI Collaboration. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints. Physical Review D, 112, 083515 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/tr6y-kpc6

III. Tristram, M., et al. Cosmological parameters derived from the final Planck data release (PR4). Astronomy & Astrophysics, 682, A37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348015

IV. Hojjati, A., Pogosian, L., & Zhao, G.-B. Testing gravity with CAMB and CosmoMC. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2011(08), 005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/08/005

V. Hu, W., & Sawicki, I. Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests. Physical Review D, 76, 064004 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064004

VI. Bellini, E., & Sawicki, I. Maximal freedom at minimum cost: Linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2014(07), 050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/050

VII. Planck Collaboration. Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, A14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525814

VIII. Eisenstein, D. J., & Hu, W. Baryonic features in the matter transfer function. The Astrophysical Journal, 496, 605–614 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/305424

IX. Hu, W., Raveri, M., Frusciante, N., & Silvestri, A. Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceleration: An implementation in CAMB. Physical Review D, 89, 103530 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530

Additional Files

Published

01-10-2026

How to Cite

Neetu Singh, & Dr. Saurabh Singh. (2026). CONSTRAINING MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS USING DESI BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS AND PLANCK CMB OBSERVATIONS: A COMPARATIVE COSMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS. International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal, 10(8), 21–24. Retrieved from https://ieasrj.com/journals/index.php/ieasrj/article/view/698