CONSTRAINING MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS USING DESI BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS AND PLANCK CMB OBSERVATIONS: A COMPARATIVE COSMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Keywords:
Modified Gravity, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, DESI, Planck CMB, ΛCDM, Cosmological Parameter Estimation, Structure Growth, Bayesian InferenceAbstract
Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations provide complementary tests of the expansion history and gravitational dynamics of the Universe. This article develops a comparative framework for assessing phenomenological and theory-based modified-gravity models against the standard flat ΛCDM reference using DESI BAO measurements and Planck CMB information. The manuscript synthesizes published observational constraints, identifies the distinct roles of geometric and growth-sensitive probes, and outlines a reproducible inference strategy for model comparison. Particular attention is given to parameter degeneracies, the distinction between background expansion and perturbation growth, and the importance of theoretical stability. Published DESI analyses show that BAO measurements tightly constrain cosmological distances and that joint combinations with CMB information improve parameter determination; however, these results do not by themselves establish a preference for modified gravity. No new MCMC chain or modified-gravity likelihood fit is claimed here. The tables and figures are therefore comparative and methodological, with quantitative values explicitly identified as published benchmarks rather than original estimates. The framework is intended to support a subsequent reproducible analysis using public likelihoods and chains.
References
I. Adame, A. G., et al. (DESI Collaboration). DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025(02), 021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021
II. DESI Collaboration. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints. Physical Review D, 112, 083515 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/tr6y-kpc6
III. Tristram, M., et al. Cosmological parameters derived from the final Planck data release (PR4). Astronomy & Astrophysics, 682, A37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348015
IV. Hojjati, A., Pogosian, L., & Zhao, G.-B. Testing gravity with CAMB and CosmoMC. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2011(08), 005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/08/005
V. Hu, W., & Sawicki, I. Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests. Physical Review D, 76, 064004 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064004
VI. Bellini, E., & Sawicki, I. Maximal freedom at minimum cost: Linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2014(07), 050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/050
VII. Planck Collaboration. Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, A14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525814
VIII. Eisenstein, D. J., & Hu, W. Baryonic features in the matter transfer function. The Astrophysical Journal, 496, 605–614 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/305424
IX. Hu, W., Raveri, M., Frusciante, N., & Silvestri, A. Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceleration: An implementation in CAMB. Physical Review D, 89, 103530 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.