TRANSFORMING FINANCIAL ASSURANCE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND BLOCKCHAIN IN AUDITING PROCESSES
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Continuous Auditing, Audit Analytics, Machine Learning, Smart Contracts, Distributed Ledger Technology, Audit AutomationAbstract
The accounting and auditing professions are undergoing a profound technological transformation driven by the convergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and blockchain technology. AI provides advanced capabilities for pattern recognition, anomaly detection, predictive analytics, natural language processing, and automated review of large volumes of financial and non-financial information. Blockchain, in contrast, provides a distributed and cryptographically secured record of transactions that can strengthen traceability, data integrity, and transparency. This conceptual paper examines how the combined application of AI and blockchain can transform accounting and auditing from predominantly periodic, sample-based activities toward continuous and risk-focused assurance. Drawing on the existing conceptual and professional literature, the paper develops a four-layer Continuous Assurance Architecture comprising data ingestion and transaction generation, blockchain-based verification and immutable storage, AI-enabled cognitive analysis and anomaly detection, and continuous reporting and decision support. The framework explains how blockchain can provide a more reliable transaction history while AI can interpret large transaction populations and identify unusual patterns, exceptions, and emerging risks. The paper further discusses implications for audit quality, professional skepticism, fraud-risk assessment, evidence evaluation, internal control monitoring, and the changing competencies of assurance professionals. At the same time, technological integration creates significant challenges involving legacy systems, privacy, cybersecurity, algorithmic bias, explainability, smart-contract risk, governance, regulatory uncertainty, and the reliability of technology-generated audit evidence. The paper argues that AI and blockchain should be viewed as complementary components of an assurance ecosystem rather than as substitutes for auditor judgment. The proposed framework provides a basis for future empirical research on implementation, audit efficiency, assurance quality, regulatory requirements, and the economic consequences of technology-enabled continuous auditing.
References
I. Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804
II. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2020). Non-authoritative support material: Audit documentation when using automated tools and techniques. International Federation of Accountants.
III. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2022). IAASB digital technology market scan: Artificial intelligence—A primer. International Federation of Accountants.
IV. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2024). Technology position. International Federation of Accountants.
V. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2026). Technology quality management roundtables: Outcomes and next steps. International Federation of Accountants.
VI. Schmitz, J., & Leoni, G. (2019). Accounting and auditing at the time of blockchain technology: A research agenda. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12286
VII. Vasarhelyi, M. A., Kogan, A., & Tuttle, B. M. (2015). Big data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 381–396.
VIII. Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfw074
IX. Coyne, J. G., & McMickle, P. L. (2017). Can blockchains serve an accounting purpose? Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(2), 101–111.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.