Niraj Rasiklal Tanna


Internet of Things based applications for smart homes, wearable health devices, and smart cities are in the evolutionary stage in India. Adoption of Internet of Things is still limited to a few application areas. In developing countries, the usefulness of IOT's adoption is recognized as a key factor for economic and social development of a country by both academicians and practitioners as well. Currently, there are still very few studies that explore the adoption of Internet of Things from a multiple theory perspective, namely, The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This research aims to satisfy a clear gap in the main field of research by proposing a Structured Equation Model (SEM) approach to test three competing models in the context of Internet of Things in India. With respect to previous literature, this research sets the stage for extensive research in a broad domain of application areas for the Internet of Things, like healthcare, elderly well being and support, smart cities and smart supply chains etc.


Internet of Things, Healthcare, Smart cities, Smart supplychain management

Full Text:



• Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A., 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Q. 227–247.

• Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1973. Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 27 (1), 41.

• Bauer, H.H., Reichardt, T., Barnes, S.J., Neumann, M.M., 2005. Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study. J. Electron. Commer. Re. 6 (3), 181.

• Chau, P.Y., Hu, P.J.H., 2002. Investigating healthcare Professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf. Manag. 39 (4), 297–311.

• Conner, M., Kirk, S.F., Cade, J.E., Barrett, J.H., 2003. Environmental influences: factors influencing a woman's decision to use dietary supplements. J. Nutr. 133 (6), 1978S–1982S.

• Currall, S.C., Judge, T.A., 1995. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 64 (2), 151–170.

• Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 319–340.

• Gao, L., Bai, X., 2014. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of Internet of Things technology. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 26 (2), 211–231.

• Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M., 2013. Internet of Things (Iot): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29 (7), 1645–1660.

• Ha, S., Stoel, L., 2009. Consumer Eshopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J. Bus. Res. 62 (5), 565–571.

• Hair Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., 2013. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PlsSem). Sage Publications, New York.

• Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., 1998. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3 (4), 424.

• Hsu, M.H., Chiu, C.M., 2004. Internet selfefficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decis. Support. Syst. 38 (3), 369–381.

• Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., Leitch, R.A., 1997. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decis. Sci. 28 (2), 357–389.

• Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L., 1999. Information technology adoption across time: a crosssectional comparison of preadoption and postadoption beliefs. MIS Q. 183213.

• Li, X., Lu, R., Liang, X., Shen, X., Chen, J., Lin, X., 2011. Smart community: an internet of things application. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49 (11), 68–75.

• Li, S., Tryfonas, T., Li, H., 2016. The internet of things: a security point of view. Internet Res. 26 (2), 337–359.

• Park, Y., Chen, J.V., 2007. Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 107 (9), 1349–1365.

• Porter, C.E., Donthu, N., 2006. Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J. Bus. Res. 59 (9), 999–1007.

• Venkatesh, V., Bala, H., 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39 (2), 273–315.

• Wojick, M., 2016. Internet of things potential for libraries. Library Hi Tech 34 (2), 404–420.

• Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., Rho, J., 2005. Extending the Tam for a Tcommerce. Inf. Manag. 42 (7), 965–976.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal